Chronic Low Back Pain: Should You Stretch It Out or Decompress It?
- Julian Simpson
- 16 hours ago
- 7 min read
Chronic Low Back Pain: Should You Stretch It Out or Decompress It?
Low back pain is stubborn. If you’ve had it for more than 3 months, you’re officially in the chronic category — and you’re definitely not alone.
🔢 Low back pain is the 2nd most common reason people seek healthcare, and it’s one of the leading causes of disability worldwide, especially in adults under 45.
So what actually works better for long-term back pain:👉 Active exercise programs👉 or gentle spinal decompression techniques like flexion–distraction?
A large randomized clinical trial set out to answer exactly that.
The Study at a Glance (Real People, Real Results)
Researchers compared two clearly defined treatments for chronic low back pain:
🧠 Flexion–Distraction (FD)A gentle chiropractic technique using slow traction and movement on a specialised table.
🏋️ Active Trunk Exercise Program (ATEP)A structured physical therapy program using strengthening, flexibility, and cardiovascular exercises.
👥 Who was studied?
235 adults aged 18+
All had low back pain lasting longer than 3 months
Patients were randomly assigned to one of the two treatments
Treatment occurred 2–4 times per week for 4 weeks
This wasn’t a small pilot — it was a well-controlled clinical trial with long-term follow-up.
The Big Result: Both Help — But Not Equally
After just 4 weeks:
✅ Both groups improved significantly
Less pain
Better movement
Better overall health scores
But here’s where it gets interesting 👇
📉 Pain Relief (VAS Scale)
Flexion–Distraction patients had significantly greater pain relief
Pain reduction was nearly double in some subgroups
This difference was statistically significant (P = 0.01)
In plain English:➡️ Both helped, but flexion–distraction reduced pain more.
Not All Back Pain Is the Same (And the Study Proved It)
One of the most important findings wasn’t just what worked — but who it worked best for.
🧠 Subgroup Analysis: Matching the Right Treatment to the Right Person
🔥 Chronic, Moderate–Severe Pain
Flexion–Distraction worked best
Pain reduction:
27% improvement with FD
14% improvement with exercise
That’s almost twice the pain relief.
⚡ Back Pain With Leg Pain (Radiculopathy / Sciatica)
Patients with nerve-related pain did significantly better with FD
This makes sense biomechanically:
Flexion–distraction reduces disc pressure
Creates space around irritated nerves
🔁 Recurrent Back Pain (Pain That Comes and Goes)
These patients tended to do better with exercise
Especially when pain was moderate to severe
📌 Takeaway:There is no “one-size-fits-all” solution for chronic back pain — and this study shows exactly why.
Why Flexion–Distraction Makes Sense (Biomechanics, Not Magic)
Flexion–distraction isn’t a forceful crack. It’s a slow, controlled decompression technique that:
✔ Reduces pressure inside spinal discs✔ Opens compressed joints✔ Improves spinal motion✔ Is especially helpful when nerves are involved
In fact, surveys show 53–58% of chiropractors use flexion–distraction when managing low back pain — and this trial helps explain why.
What About Function and Quality of Life?
Interestingly:
Both groups improved equally in:
Daily function (Roland Morris Questionnaire)
Overall health (SF-36 scores)
So while flexion–distraction relieved pain more effectively, exercise still played an important role in restoring function.
This highlights something we see clinically all the time 👇👉 Pain relief and functional recovery aren’t always the same thing — and both matter.
Safety Matters (And This Is Big)
🚨 Zero adverse events were reportedNo injuries. No worsening symptoms. No serious side effects.
That’s a huge win for patients considering conservative, non-surgical care.
What This Means for Patients at Health Wise Chiropractic
If you have chronic low back pain, this research tells us:
✔ Chiropractic care isn’t just “hands-on” — it’s evidence-based✔ Gentle techniques like flexion–distraction can outperform exercise for the right patient✔ Matching treatment to pain type, severity, and nerve involvement matters✔ Combining pain relief with movement and rehab leads to better outcomes long-term
At Health Wise Chiropractic, this is exactly why care should be:
Individualised
Based on how your pain behaves
Focused on both relief and long-term resilience
The Bottom Line
💡 Both movement and chiropractic care help chronic low back pain.But when pain is severe, persistent, or nerve-related, flexion–distraction may offer superior pain relief — especially early in care.
And that’s not opinion — it’s clinical trial evidence.
If you’re tired of guessing what will work for your back, science suggests the answer depends on you, not just the exercise sheet or treatment label.
For more information about how we can help YOU with your pain and improve your underlying dysfunction so the problem doesn’t come back .
Please call Health Wise Chiropractic 03 9467 7889 or book online to see one of our Chiropractors in Sunbury or Melton/Strathtulloh Today!
We are also really proud to offer our patients an APP for their Mobile- iPad. With access to your rehab exercises and our health tip blogs with over 600 articles.
Chiropractic has moved online. We offer our online program -STAND CORRECTED- To help you through the day.
We have over 30 programs on different health conditions
Each program contains
- Information about the conditions
- things to do and things to avoid
- nutrition advice
- all the stretches that are needed to help
References
Andersson GB (1999) Epidemiological features of chronic low-back pain. Lancet 354:581–585
Assendelft WJ, Morton SC, Yu EI, Suttorp MJ, Shekelle PG (2003) Spinal manipulation for low back pain. A meta-analysis of effectiveness relative to other therapies. Ann Intern Med 138:881
Beaton DE, Hogg-Johnson S, Bombar- dier C (1997) Evaluating changes in health status: reliability and responsive- ness of five generic health status mea- sures in workers with musculoskeletal disorders. J Clin Epidemiol 50:79–93
Childs JD, Fritz JM, Flynn TW, Irr- gang JJ, Johnson KK, Majkowski GR, Delitto A (2004) A clinical prediction rule to identify patients with low back pain most likely to benefit from spinal manipulation: a validation study. Ann Intern Med 141:920–928
Christensen MG, Kerkoff D, Kollasch MW (2000) Job analysis of chiropractic, 2000. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Greeley
Cox JM (1999) Low back pain: mecha- nism, diagnosis, treatment. 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Balti- more
Cox JM, Gudavalli MR (2005) Traction and distraction techniques. In: Hald- eman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B, Grun- net-Nilsson N, Hooper PD, Meeker WC, Triano J (eds) Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 821–840
Deyo RA, Phillips WR (1996) Low back pain. A primary challenge. Spine 21:2826–2832
Flynn T, Fritz J, Witman J, Wainner R, Magel J, Rendeiro D, Butler B, Garber M, Allison S (2002) A clinical prediction rule for classifying patients with low back pain who demonstrate short-term improvement with spinal manipulation. Spine 27:2835–2843
Furlan AD, Brosseau L, Imamura M, Irvin E (2002) Massage for low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001929
Gatchel RJ (ed) (2001) Compendium of outcome instruments for assessment and research of spinal disorders. North American Spine Society, LaGrange
Gudavalli MR, Cox JM, Baker JA, Cramer GD, Patwardhan AG (1997) Intervertebral disc pressure changes
during the flexion–distraction procedurefor low back pain. In: Proceedings ofthe 1997 annual International Societyfor the Study of the Lumbar Spine, S127
Singapore, p 16513. Gudavalli MR, Cox JM, Baker JA,
Cramer GD, Patwardhan AG (1997) Intervertebral disc pressure changes during a chiropractic procedure for low back pain. American Society
of Mechanical Engineers bioengineer- ing conference, Dallas, TX, pp 215– 216
14. Gudavalli MR, Cox JM, Cramer GD, Baker JA, Patwardhan AG (2000) Ver- tebral motions during flexion–distrac- tion treatment for low back pain. 2000 ASME international mechanical engi- neering congress and exposition, Or- lando, FL, pp 129–130
15. Helmhout PH, Harts CC, Staal JB, Candel MJ, de Bie RA (2004) Com- parison of a high-intensity and a low- intensity lumbar extensor training pro- gram as minimal intervention treatment in low back pain: a randomized trial. Eur Spine J 13:537–547
16. Huskisson EC (1982) Measurement of pain. J Rheumatol 9:768–769
26. Niemisto L, Kalso E, Malmivaara A, Seitsalo S, Hurri H (2003) Radiofre- quency denervation for neck and back pain. A systematic review of random- ized controlled trials. Cochrane Data- base Syst Rev (1):CD004058
27. Ohnmeiss DD, Rashbaum RF (2001) Patient satisfaction with spinal cord stimulation for predominant complaints of chronic, intractable low back pain. Spine J 1:358–363
28. O’Sullivan PB (2000) Lumbar segmen- tal ‘instability’ clinical presentation and specific stabilizing exercise manage- ment. Man Ther 5:2–12
29. O’Sullivan PB, Phyty GD, Twomey LT, Allison GT (1997) Evaluation of specific stabilizing exercise in the treatment of chronic low back pain with radiologic diagnosis of spondylolysis or spondyl- olisthesis. Spine 22:2959–2967
30. Roland M, Morris R (1983) A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability and low back pain. Spine 8:141–144
31. Triano JJ, McGregor M, Hondras MA, Brennan PC (1995) Manipulative ther- apy versus education programs in chronic low back pain. Spine 20:948–
17. Katz N, Rodgers DB, Krupa D, ReicinA (2004) Onset of pain relief with ro-fecoxib in chronic low back pain: resultsof two four-week, randomized, placebo- controlled trials. Curr Med Res Opin20:651–658 955
18. Koes BW, Assendelft WJ, van der Heijden GJ, Bouter LM (1996) Spinal manipulation for low back pain. An updated systematic review of random- ized clinical trials. Spine 21:2872–2873
19. Lubeck DP (2003) The costs of muscu- loskeletal disease: health needs assess- ment and health economics. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 17:529–539
20. Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ, Evans TH (2002) Chronic low back pain. In: Fitzgerald RH, Kaufer H, Malkani AL (eds) Orthopaedics. Mosby, St Louis, pp 1192–1197
21. McDowell I, Newell C (1996) Measur- ing health: a guide to rating scales and questionnaires. Oxford University Press, New York
22. Mior S (2001) Exercise in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain 17:S77–S85
23. Mior S (2001) Manipulation and mobilization in the treatment of chronic pain. Clin J Pain 17:S70–S76
24. Murphy DR, Morris C (2005) Manual examination of the patient. In: Hald- eman S, Dagenais S, Budgell B, Grun- net-Nilsson N, Hooper PD, Meeker WC, Triano J (eds) Principles and practice of chiropractic. 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 593–610
32. van Tulder M, Malmivaara A, Esmail R, Koes B (2000) Exercise therapy for low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine 25:2784–2796
33. Turk DC (2005) The potential of treat- ment matching for subgroups of pa- tients with chronic pain: lumping versus splitting. Clin J Pain 21:44–55
34. Vollenbroek-Hutton MMR, Hermens HJ, Wever D, Gorter M, Rinket J, Ijz- erman MJ (2004) Differences in out- come of a multidisciplinary treatment between subgroups of chronic low back pain patients defined using two multi- axial assessment instruments: the mul- tidimensional pain inventory and lumbar dynamometry. Clin Rehabil 18:566–579
Comments